Silverstone's Botched Restart: FIA Blames A Software Error
Formula 1

Silverstone's Botched Restart: FIA Blames A Software Error

7 July 2026 3 min readBy F1 Drive Desk (AI-assisted)

Charles Leclerc won the British Grand Prix, but the closing laps were decided by a false restart message the FIA blamed on a software error. Pundits are split on whether Silverstone could have gone racing.

Key Takeaways

  • 1."We were robbed of six laps of wheel-to-wheel battle for the leader of the race," said the Inside Line F1 Podcast's Soumil Arora, who has soured on the season's energy-led racing.
  • 2."It was actually an error from the FIA to say we'll get racing for the final-lap shootout, because it was an erroneous, optimistic message," Autosport's Jake Boxall-Legge said on the outlet's race review.
  • 3.As the field bunched up, the timing screens flashed the words the record weekend crowd craved: safety car in this lap, lapped cars may overtake.

Silverstone delivered a Ferrari win and a furious crowd on Sunday, and the two had almost nothing to do with each other. Charles Leclerc ended a drought stretching back to October 2024, yet the closing laps of the British Grand Prix belonged to a message that was never meant to appear.

Max Verstappen had speared into the Stowe gravel with four laps to run, prompting a late safety car. As the field bunched up, the timing screens flashed the words the record weekend crowd craved: safety car in this lap, lapped cars may overtake. A one-lap dash for the win looked on. Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton pitted for fresh rubber. Moments later the instruction was withdrawn, the safety car stayed out, and the race dribbled to its conclusion behind it. The grandstands jeered.

The FIA soon owned up: a software error had shown the message. Under its own regulations, a green-flag finish had never been possible.

The reason traces back to Abu Dhabi 2021. In the rewrite that followed, every lapped car must complete a full lap of unlapping before the safety car can withdraw. Around a circuit as long as Silverstone, and called that late, there was simply no time left.

"It was actually an error from the FIA to say we'll get racing for the final-lap shootout, because it was an erroneous, optimistic message," Autosport's Jake Boxall-Legge said on the outlet's race review. "The procedure ultimately was followed correctly and we should have finished under the safety car — and we did, because that's what the rules say. The FIA just made a bit of a hash of it."

Others weren't convinced race control had no choice. On Sky, one analyst voiced the mood in the stands: "There was no reason they could not have gone racing." The track was dry, Verstappen's car was safely in the gravel, and the rulebook lets the race director resume once conditions are safe.

Kimi Antonelli paid the heaviest price. The points leader had been hauling Leclerc in — Mercedes reckoned he would have caught the Ferrari with about six laps left — when a guard on his front-left wheel broke after he brushed a kerb at Copse. The balance went, then a five-second track-limits penalty buried him in 16th, scoreless. Toto Wolff noted the lost points still counted; Antonelli's advantage over George Russell is down to 25.

"We were robbed of six laps of wheel-to-wheel battle for the leader of the race," said the Inside Line F1 Podcast's Soumil Arora, who has soured on the season's energy-led racing. "It is fun, but it's not real racing."

Verstappen, meanwhile, lost his Red Bull at high speed for a second straight weekend. He branded it dangerous and, reporters said, admitted he simply wanted to go home and forget about Formula 1.

There were dissenters to the doom. Autosport's Kevin Turner argued the season has served up plenty of racing and cited Melbourne's overtaking tally. "I'd rather this than what we've had the last few years, when nothing happened," he said. His remedy for the finish is a throwback: stop unlapping the backmarkers, restart sooner, and dodge another Abu Dhabi while you're at it.